Studio Matrx Monthly · Volume 1 · Issue 2 · July 2026
Amogh N P
 In loving memory of Amogh N P — Architect · Designer · Visionary 

Interactive Comparator · 2026

STP Technology Comparison Matrix

Weigh Extended Aeration, MBBR, SBR, MBR and UASB against each other across footprint, effluent quality, capex, opex, simplicity and reuse-readiness. Choose what matters most and see the best-fit plant.

Best fit when you prioritise Effluent qualityMBRWeighted score 0 pts · runner-up SBR

Weighted total score per technology — winner in green

1

Set your priority

The chosen criterion's column is highlighted and weighted higher in the total.

×3

How much more the priority counts than the other five criteria (each fixed at ×1).

Recommended technology
MBR
Winning score
0 pts
Runner-up score
0 pts

The full comparison matrix

Every technology scored 1–5 on each criterion (5 = best). The Effluent quality column is highlighted and weighted ×3.

TechnologyLandEffluentCapexOpexSimpleReuseScore
Extended AerationRobust, land-hungry, forgiving to run23434325
MBBRCompact media, easy retrofit, low fuss33444327
SBRBatch cycles, good effluent, automation-led34333428
MBRSmallest footprint, best effluent, priciest55222531
UASBAnaerobic, very low power, weak effluent42453224

How this works

  • Each technology is rated 1–5 on all six criteria, where 5 is best. For capex and opex a lower real cost earns a higher score, so bigger is always better.
  • Weighted total = sum of every rating, but your priority (Effluent quality) is multiplied by ×3 instead of ×1.
  • The technology with the highest total wins — right now MBR at 31 pts, ahead of SBR (28 pts).

A directional guide for shortlisting, not a substitute for site-specific design. Confirm land, load, discharge norms and lifecycle cost with a qualified consultant before selecting a technology.