Studio Matrx Monthly · Volume 1 · Issue 2 · July 2026
Amogh N P
 In loving memory of Amogh N P — Architect · Designer · Visionary 

Utilities & Downloads

Designer Evaluation Scorecard

Rate your designer across 5 categories, 4 parameters each — total out of 100. Download a branded PDF scorecard with your results.

Evaluating an interior designer with a scorecard
5 CATEGORIES · 20 PARAMETERS · SCORE OUT OF 100Portfolio4 parametersCommunication4 parametersProposal4 parametersProcess4 parametersReferences4 parametersYOUR SCORE80 / 1000–40 Avoid41–60 Caution61–80 Hire81–100 Top pickRate every parameter 1–5. Each section weighted equally.
0 of 20 parameters ratedScore: —

Instructions

Rate each parameter from 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent). Each section is scored out of 20. Grand total is out of 100.

1

Portfolio & Experience

0 / 20

Quality of completed projects

Not rated

Technical detailing & functionality

Not rated

Experience relevance to my project

Not rated

Client testimonials & references

Not rated
2

Process & Professionalism

0 / 20

Clarity of design workflow

Not rated

Quality of drawings & documentation

Not rated

Transparency in BOQ & specifications

Not rated

Contract clarity & structure

Not rated
3

Budget & Transparency

0 / 20

Clear material brand disclosure

Not rated

Fair pricing structure

Not rated

Milestone-based payment schedule

Not rated

Change order clarity

Not rated
4

Communication & Compatibility

0 / 20

Listening & responsiveness

Not rated

Alignment with my design vision

Not rated

Problem-solving approach

Not rated

Overall comfort level

Not rated
5

Execution Capability

0 / 20

Site supervision process

Not rated

Vendor network strength

Not rated

Quality control systems

Not rated

Warranty & after-sales support

Not rated

Compare Designers

Add up to two more designers (use section totals 0–20) and toggle a scenario to re-weight.

Scenario weighting

1. Portfolio & Experience/ 20
2. Process & Professionalism/ 20
3. Budget & Transparency/ 20
4. Communication & Compatibility/ 20
5. Execution Capability/ 20
1. Portfolio & Experience/ 20
2. Process & Professionalism/ 20
3. Budget & Transparency/ 20
4. Communication & Compatibility/ 20
5. Execution Capability/ 20

Top ranked

0/100

Designer A

1Designer A0/100

Criteria comparison (Balanced)

Final Scoring Summary

Portfolio & Experience
Process & Professionalism
Budget & Transparency
Communication & Compatibility
Execution Capability
Total Score0 / 100
85–100: Excellent – Strongly Recommended  ·  70–84: Very Good – Safe Choice  ·  55–69: Moderate – Evaluate Carefully  ·  Below 55: High Risk – Reconsider

Download Your Scorecard PDF

Your details and the designer's name will appear on the PDF. All scores and the final result are included.

What good designer evaluation looks like

Reviewing designer portfolio
Client meeting with designer
Designer at site visit
Designer proposal document
Handover day site walk

Score Your Shortlist — Then Brief the Winner

Pick the designer with the highest score, then drop your room photo into DesignAI to give them a head-start brief — renders, palette, and material direction in one PDF.

Try DesignAI Free

Disclaimer: This scorecard is provided by Studio Matrx – DesignAI for informational and planning purposes only. It does not constitute professional architectural, legal, or financial advice. All outputs are indicative and non-binding. Users must consult licensed architects and qualified professionals before making any final decisions. Studio Matrx is not liable for decisions made based on this scorecard. Governed by the laws of India — Courts of Karnataka.