Amogh N P
 In loving memory of Amogh N P — Architect · Designer · Visionary 
DDA · Delhi (NCT)FAR / FSIVerified 2026-05-10

FAR in Delhi (DDA / MCD) — A 2026 Architect's Working Reference

Floor Area Ratio under MPD 2021 and the Unified Building Bye-laws 2016 — baseline FAR percentage by plot category, DDA-layout overrides, TOD bonus FAR around metro stations, and the LBZ heritage caps in central New Delhi.

Governing framework: Master Plan for Delhi 2021 (MPD 2021) + Unified Building Bye-laws 2016

Delhi residential FAR utilisation — a Dwarka or Rohini DDA layout block showing the consistent built-up to plot-area ratio, mature trees, late-afternoon golden light

Working reference tables

Print or screenshot these for the studio wall. Cross-check against the current authority notification before any specific filing.

Residential FAR by plot category (Unified Building Bye-laws 2016)

Delhi expresses FAR as percentage of plot area. Smaller plots get higher FAR; larger plots get lower FAR — the opposite of Bengaluru's RMP 2031 matrix.

Plot CategoryPlot SizePermitted FARGround Coverage
IUp to 50 sqm350% (3.5)90%
II50–100 sqm300% (3.0)75%
III100–250 sqm225% (2.25)60%
IV250–500 sqm200% (2.0)50%
VAbove 500 sqm150–200% (1.5–2.0)40%

Indicative values from MPD 2021 + Unified Building Bye-laws 2016. Specific DDA layouts and special zones (LBZ, heritage, TOD) prescribe overrides. Always verify the current notification.

TOD Bonus FAR — within 500 m of notified metro stations

Transit-Oriented Development zones permit bonus FAR over the baseline against TOD premium fees and infrastructure contributions.

Distance from metro stationBonus FAR over baselineConditions
≤ 200 m (inner core)+50%Mixed-use; TOD premium fee; infrastructure capacity certification
200–500 m (outer zone)+25%Mixed-use; TOD premium fee; affordable-housing component encouraged
> 500 mNo bonusStandard MPD 2021 baseline applies

Active TOD corridors include Karol Bagh, Mayur Vihar Phase 1, Dwarka Sector 21, ITO area, and Hauz Khas. Each metro corridor has its own TOD notification.

LBZ heritage FAR caps — Lutyens' Bungalow Zone

LBZ plots follow NDMC heritage-zone regulations with FAR well below the standard Cat IV–V baseline.

ParameterLBZ valueStandard Cat IV–V
FAR / FAR%≈ 100% (FAR 1.0)150–200% (FAR 1.5–2.0)
Ground coverage≤ 25%40–50%
Height≈ 11 m / G+1Up to 17.5 m
Heritage NOCMandatory (HCC)Not required

LBZ extent is bounded approximately by Kasturba Gandhi Marg, Sardar Patel Marg, Aurobindo Marg, and Mathura Road.

FAR exclusions (Unified Building Bye-laws 2016)

Categories of floor area excluded from countable FAR. The architect's FAR statement must enumerate exclusions clause-by-clause.

Zone / UseFAR treatmentConditions
Basement parkingFully excludedUsed for parking + services only
Stilt parkingExcluded up to 2.4 m heightOn plots above 100 sqm
Service ducts / shaftsExcludedDedicated, continuous
Terrace mumty / lift overrun / water tankExcluded subject to area capPer bye-laws schedule
Open balconiesPartially excludedPer zone clause; stricter caps than BBMP

Delhi's exclusion regime is broadly similar to BBMP's but with tighter caps on terrace appurtenances. Submit FAR statement in percentage notation to match bye-laws convention.

The working reference, in full

Delhi's FAR (Floor Area Ratio) framework — under the Master Plan for Delhi 2021 (MPD 2021) and the Unified Building Bye-laws 2016 — is plot-category-driven, like Delhi's setback regime. Smaller plots get higher FAR (Category I at 350%) reflecting the dense row-house typology of urban villages and unauthorised-regularised colonies; larger plots get progressively lower FAR (Category V at 150–200%), reflecting the bungalow-zone typology of South Delhi and LBZ. Delhi expresses FAR as a percentage of plot area, not a decimal — FAR 200% is identical to FAR 2.0, but the architect's submission to MCD must use percentage notation to match bye-laws convention and avoid sanction queries.

Bar chart showing FAR percentage by Delhi plot category — Cat I 350%, Cat II 300%, Cat III 225%, Cat IV 200%, Cat V 175% — illustrating how Delhi inverts the size-FAR relationship
Delhi's FAR scales <em>inversely</em> with plot size — small plots get more FAR per sqm, large plots get less. This is the opposite of Bengaluru's plot-size-driven matrix. · tap to zoom

DDA-layout overrides

DDA layouts (Vasant Kunj, Dwarka, Rohini, Saket, Hauz Khas Enclave, etc.) often have layout-specific FAR caps that override the Unified Bye-laws baseline. Older DDA cooperative-society layouts may have FAR caps as low as 100% (FAR 1.0); newer layouts like Dwarka Sector 22 may permit Category III rates of 225%. The DDA layout sanction plan and the cooperative-society allotment letter are the authoritative documents — the bye-laws table is a default that applies only where the layout is silent. The architect's pre-design verification: which framework — layout or bye-laws — applies to this plot.

TOD zones and the bonus FAR mechanism

MPD 2021 introduced Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) zones around notified Delhi Metro stations — typically a 500 m radius from each station, with an inner core of 200 m carrying higher bonus. Within TOD zones, plots are eligible for bonus FAR over the baseline (typically up to 25–50%) against payment of a TOD premium fee, an affordable-housing component, and infrastructure-capacity certification. The TOD framework is one of Delhi's most progressive planning tools and is actively used on plots near Karol Bagh, Mayur Vihar Phase 1, Dwarka Sector 21, ITO, and Hauz Khas metro stations. Each metro corridor has its own TOD notification — bonus values and conditions vary.

Documentary photograph of a Delhi TOD corridor street near a metro station — mid-rise mixed-use buildings with retail at ground level and residential above, metro station entrance visible in mid-ground, pedestrian and auto-rickshaw activity
Karol Bagh, Hauz Khas, Mayur Vihar — TOD corridors where the bonus FAR is materialising as mid-rise mixed-use redevelopment. Inner 200 m gets +50%; outer 200–500 m gets +25%. · tap to zoom

LBZ FAR caps — heritage overrides everything

Plots in the Lutyens' Bungalow Zone (LBZ) face FAR caps of around 100% (FAR 1.0) with ground coverage capped at 25% — well below the standard Cat IV–V baseline of 150–200%. Heritage-listed structures elsewhere in Delhi (Daryaganj, Civil Lines, Kashmere Gate) face similar restrictions through the Heritage Conservation Committee (HCC). The architect's pre-design verification must confirm whether the plot sits in a heritage zone or carries a heritage-listed grading; both override the standard FAR matrix. Without HCC NOC, MCD and NDMC will not sanction LBZ work regardless of bye-laws compliance.

Photograph of an LBZ bungalow showing the heritage FAR cap visually — single-storey or G+1 bungalow on a large plot with generous garden, low building footprint, exemplifying the 25% ground coverage and FAR 100% cap
An LBZ bungalow's footprint visibly trails its plot — that's the 25% ground coverage cap and FAR 100% cap in built form. Heritage costs density, and the cost is visible. · tap to zoom

Stilt, basement, and terrace exclusions

MPD 2021 + Unified Building Bye-laws 2016 typically exclude from FAR computation: basement parking (fully excluded if used for parking and services), stilt parking (excluded up to 2.4 m height on plots above 100 sqm), service ducts (excluded if dedicated), terrace mumty / lift overrun / water tank (excluded subject to area limits), and open balconies (partially excluded depending on the bye-laws clause). Delhi's exclusion regime is broadly similar to BBMP's and Mumbai's but with somewhat tighter caps on terrace appurtenances — a 30 sqm mumty that BBMP would accept may exceed Delhi's cap.

OBPAS sanction — submission and percentage-notation FAR

MCD's OBPAS (Online Building Plan Approval System) requires the architect's FAR computation in percentage notation matching the bye-laws table — FAR 200%, not FAR 2.0. Submitting in decimal form triggers an MCD query and delays sanction. The FAR statement must enumerate exclusions clause-by-clause against the bye-laws schedule, and any TOD bonus or DDA-layout override must be explicitly cited with the relevant notification reference. JIC inspection at plinth and at completion verifies the as-built area against the certified FAR statement; on-site overshoot is a stop-work trigger.

Photograph of an architect's studio scene — registered architect at a desktop submitting FAR statement via the MCD OBPAS portal, screen showing percentage-notation form, architectural drawings on the side desk
Submission via OBPAS — the percentage-notation form catches decimal-FAR submissions and bounces them as queries. A small notation slip becomes a delayed sanction. · tap to zoom

Common pitfalls

  • Treating bye-laws FAR as authoritative within a DDA layout — the layout sanction governs.
  • Submitting FAR in decimal notation (e.g., 2.0) instead of percentage (200%) — triggers MCD OBPAS query.
  • Missing the TOD zone overlay on plots within 500 m of a metro station — the bonus FAR is a real lever in feasibility studies.
  • Ignoring LBZ / heritage FAR caps on plots in central Delhi — heritage rules override the standard matrix regardless of category.
  • Forgetting that Delhi inverts the size-FAR relationship — small plots get HIGHER FAR percentage, not lower.
  • Counting stilt parking floor space above 2.4 m as excluded — only up to 2.4 m height qualifies; above counts as countable area.

Frequently asked questions

What is the maximum FAR for residential plots in Delhi?
Under MPD 2021 + Unified Bye-laws 2016, FAR ranges from 150% (large Category V plots) to 350% (Category I plots up to 50 sqm). With TOD bonus FAR, eligible plots can extend higher within the TOD zone notification.
Why does Delhi use FAR percentage instead of decimal?
Delhi's bye-laws have used percentage FAR since the older Master Plans, reflecting the percentage-of-plot-coverage convention. FAR 200% is identical to FAR 2.0 — the architect's submission must match the bye-laws notation to avoid OBPAS queries.
Do DDA cooperative-society layouts have higher or lower FAR than the bye-laws default?
It depends on the layout. Older cooperative-society layouts often have FAR caps lower than the bye-laws default (e.g., 100% versus 200%); newer DDA layouts often align with or match the bye-laws default. The original layout sanction plan is the authoritative document.
What is TOD bonus FAR?
Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) zones around notified metro stations permit bonus FAR — typically 25% in the outer 200–500 m zone and 50% in the inner 200 m core — against a TOD premium fee, infrastructure-capacity certification, and a mixed-use development requirement. The TOD scheme is notified per metro corridor.
How much FAR can an LBZ plot consume?
Approximately 100% (FAR 1.0) under NDMC heritage controls, with ground coverage capped at 25%. A 1,000 sqm LBZ plot can build approximately 1,000 sqm of countable area, distributed within the height cap of ~11 m / G+1.
Are NDMC area FAR rules different from MCD area FAR?
Yes. NDMC area (Connaught Place, Lutyens' Delhi) operates under separate NDMC Building Bye-laws with different FAR matrices and heritage controls. MCD area follows the Unified Building Bye-laws 2016.

Sources & references

  • Delhi Development Act, 1957

    Act No. 61 of 1957 — DDA master-plan and FAR-prescription powers

  • Master Plan for Delhi 2021 (MPD 2021)

    Delhi Development Authority, MPD 2021 — Volume I and II; FAR matrix, plot-category framework, TOD framework

  • Unified Building Bye-laws 2016

    MCD, Unified Building Bye-laws 2016 — plot category FAR matrix and exclusions

  • TOD Norms — MPD 2021 amendments

    MPD 2021 TOD framework notifications — bonus FAR by metro corridor

  • NDMC Building Bye-laws and LBZ Heritage Regulations

    NDMC Building Bye-laws — Lutyens' Bungalow Zone FAR cap and heritage controls

  • OBPAS — Online Building Plan Approval System

    MCD OBPAS portal — FAR submission in percentage notation, JIC inspection scheduling

  • National Building Code of India (NBC) 2016

    Bureau of Indian Standards, NBC 2016 — Volume 1 Part 3 General Building Requirements

Disclaimer: Regulatory rates and dimensional rules change frequently and may be modified by mid-year notifications. Values reflect the framework as of 2026-05-10; verify against the current authority notification before any specific filing. This page is informational and is not legal or planning advice — engage a registered architect and a qualified planning consultant for project-specific compliance.