Amogh N P
 In loving memory of Amogh N P — Architect · Designer · Visionary 
A deteriorated concrete column — cracked, spalling cover over rusting reinforcement: the expanding rust that breaks the concrete from within.
Unit IIBuilding Maintenance & Repair

Defects & Deterioration

How buildings decay — dampness, cracks and the rust that breaks concrete.

≈ 45 min + studio task

To cure a building you must first know what is killing it. The agents are few but relentless: moisture (the dominant one), cracks, weathering, biological growth and chemical attack. In reinforced concrete the great enemy is corrosion — and the key insight is that rust EXPANDS to several times the steel's volume, splitting the cover and spalling it off. Diagnose symptoms with the explorer below.

Learning objectives

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to — mapped to the course outcomes for Building Maintenance & Repair:

1
CO2 · Understand

Identify the agents of decay — moisture, cracks, weathering, biological, chemical.

2
CO2 · Understand

Explain concrete deterioration — carbonation, chloride, corrosion, spalling.

3
CO2 · Analyse

Classify cracks and distinguish active (structural) from dead (cosmetic).

4
CO2 · Understand

Explain the role of cover and crack width (IS 456).

Damp & the enemies of concrete

The agents of decay

Most decay starts with water; in concrete, carbonation depassivates the steel and then expanding rust spalls the cover.[1, 2]

Rising damp — water climbs the wall ground tide-mark ~1 m DPC (missing/bridged) capillary action draws ground moisture up — cure: a new damp-proof course
DiagramA wall section showing rising damp — moisture drawn up by capillary action to a tide-mark where the DPC has failed

Diagnose the defect · pick a symptom

Likely cause

Rising damp — ground moisture drawn up by capillary action because the damp-proof course is missing, bridged or failed.

Remedy

Insert or chemically inject a new damp-proof course; lower external ground level below the DPC; fix drainage.

Always treat the cause, not just the symptom — and confirm a crack is active before repairing it.

The dominant agent

Most building decay starts with water. RISING DAMP draws ground moisture up by capillary action (typically a tide-mark to ~1 m) where the damp-proof course is missing or bridged. PENETRATING (rain) DAMP enters laterally through defective pointing, render, flashings or cracks. CONDENSATION forms when warm moist air meets a cold surface — a ventilation problem, not a leak. Identify which of the three you have, because each has a different cure. Weathering, biological growth (mould, algae, termites) and chemical attack follow the water.[1]

Carbonation strips protection → rust spalls cover pH ~13 → ~8–9 carbonation depassivates the steel rust ~2.5–6× volume → cover spalls off
DiagramHow concrete fails — carbonation lowers the pH and depassivates the steel, then expanding rust spalls the cover
Active, dead, and the IS 456 numbers

Reading cracks

Distinguish an active (moving, structural) crack from a dead (cosmetic) one, and remember durability rides on cover and crack width (IS 456).[1, 3]

Not every crack is structural Dead — stable (cosmetic) shrinkage crazing — fill rigidly Active — moving (structural) tapering, growing — monitor & fix cause
DiagramTwo cracks — a dead shrinkage-crazing pattern, and an active tapering structural crack still moving

Active vs dead

Not every crack is structural. A DEAD (dormant) crack is stable — drying-shrinkage crazing in plaster, for instance — and can be rigidly filled. An ACTIVE ('live') crack is still moving — from settlement, overload or thermal cycling — and must be MONITORED to confirm movement and have its CAUSE addressed before repair, using a method that accommodates movement. FLAG THE MYTH: distinguish cosmetic shrinkage cracks from active structural ones — only the latter threaten capacity.[1]

The deterioration facts

At a glance

AspectOneThe other
Three dampsRising (capillary) / penetrating (rain)Condensation (ventilation, not a leak)
Carbonation vs chlorideCarbonation: pH drop depassivatesChloride: pits even at high pH
The corrosion mythNot just steel 'getting thinner'Rust EXPANDS ~2.5–6× → spalls cover
Crack lifeDead: stable, fill rigidlyActive: moving, fix the cause first
Durability (IS 456)Cover 20–75 mm by exposureCrack width ≤ 0.3 mm (0.2 aggressive)
Vocabulary

Key terms

Rising damp

Ground moisture drawn up a wall by capillary action where the DPC is missing or bridged (~1 m).

Penetrating damp

Water entering laterally through defective pointing, render, flashings or cracks.

Carbonation

CO₂ lowering concrete pH (~13 → ~8–9), depassivating the steel so corrosion can start.

Chloride attack

Chloride ions pitting the reinforcement even at high pH (sea air, salts).

Spalling

Cover concrete cracking and falling away as expanding rust (~2.5–6× steel volume) splits it.

Active / dead crack

A moving (live) crack vs a stable (dormant) one — different repairs.

Cover (IS 456)

The protective concrete over the steel — 20–75 mm by exposure class.

Efflorescence

White soluble-salt crystals left on a surface by evaporating water — a damp symptom.

Apply it

Studio task

Walk a real building and photograph three defects; for each, use the diagnosis explorer above to name the likely cause and decide whether it is cosmetic or structural — and what you would check next.

Check your understanding

Self-assessment

1. Reinforcement corrosion spalls concrete because —

2. Carbonation harms reinforced concrete by —

3. A fine 'map' crazing pattern in plaster is usually —

In a nutshell

Recap

The agents of decay are moisture (the dominant one — rising, penetrating, condensation), cracks, weathering, biological growth and chemical attack.
In concrete, carbonation lowers the pH and depassivates the steel (it doesn't harm the concrete directly), and chlorides pit it — then rust expands ~2.5–6× and spalls the cover.
Distinguish active (moving, structural) cracks from dead (stable, cosmetic) ones — only the former threaten capacity.
Durability is governed by IS 456's cover (20–75 mm by exposure) and crack-width limits (≤ 0.3 mm).
The evidence

References & further reading

  1. [1]Barry A. Richardson, Defects and Deterioration in Buildings (2nd ed.). Spon/Routledge, 2001.
  2. [2]Peter H. Emmons, Concrete Repair and Maintenance Illustrated. RSMeans/Wiley, 1993.
  3. [3]IS 456:2000 — Plain and Reinforced Concrete, Code of Practice (durability, cover, crack width). BIS. https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.456.2000.pdf

Further reading

  • Barry Richardson, Defects and Deterioration in Buildings. Routledge.
  • Peter Emmons, Concrete Repair and Maintenance Illustrated. Wiley.
  • W. H. Ransom, Building Failures: Diagnosis and Avoidance. E&FN Spon.

Sources gathered and fact-checked June 2026. Published values vary by source, sample and method — treat as indicative and confirm against the cited standard before structural use.