Studio Matrx Monthly · Volume 1 · Issue 4 · September 2026
Amogh N P
 In loving memory of Amogh N P — Architect · Designer · Visionary 
Building With the Living WorldLesson 0.1
Bio-based & Living Materials/Module 0 · Materials That Grow

Lesson 0.1 · Materials That Grow

Building With the Living World

We build mostly from things we dig up and burn into permanence - fired brick, smelted steel, cooked cement - but there is another whole family of materials that we grow instead of extract, that pull carbon from the air as they form, and that at the far frontier are not just grown but alive; learning to build with the living world is one of the most hopeful shifts in how we make buildings

12 min Interactive lessonFree · open lessonByAmogh N P· Architect & interior designer
The hook

Most of what we build with, we dig out of the earth and cook into permanence. But some materials we grow - and a few, we can even keep alive.

Consider where a conventional building's materials come from. We quarry and fire clay into brick, mine iron ore and smelt it into steel, dig up limestone and cook it at fierce heat into cement. These are extractive, energy-hungry, carbon-heavy processes - we take finite matter from the earth and use enormous heat to force it into durable form, releasing carbon at almost every step. It has given us extraordinary buildings, but at a cost the climate can no longer absorb: making materials is one of the largest sources of construction's carbon (the subject of the Embodied Carbon course).

There is another whole family of materials that works the opposite way: instead of being dug up and burned into shape, they are grown. Bio-based materials come from renewable biological sources - plants, trees, fungi, agricultural crops and their residues - timber and bamboo, hemp and straw, cork and wood-fibre, and newer arrivals like mycelium (grown from fungi) and bioplastics. Because they grow by drawing carbon dioxide out of the air through photosynthesis, many of them *store* carbon rather than emitting it, and because they regrow, they are renewable in a way a quarry never is. And at the far frontier sits something stranger and newer still: living materials - materials that are not merely grown but are, or recently were, *alive*, and can grow, self-heal or respond - mycelium composites, bacteria that grow 'bio-cement', self-healing bio-concrete, and living walls. This course is about that whole family: building with the living world rather than only against it. It is one of the most hopeful and imaginative frontiers in materials - and, this course insists from the start, one where 'natural' and 'bio-based' are far too easily mistaken for 'automatically sustainable', which they are not.

Build with the living world. Grown (bio-based, stores carbon, renewable) + alive (living, the frontier). But 'natural' != green - verify sourcing, durability, carbon.

Extracted versus grown - a different logic of matter

The deepest way to grasp bio-based materials is to contrast the two logics of where building matter comes from. The dominant logic is extractive: quarry, mine or drill a finite material out of the earth, then apply large amounts of energy - usually heat - to transform it into a durable building product. Firing brick, smelting steel, calcining cement, melting glass: all take non-renewable raw material and cook it, and the cooking (plus, for cement, a chemical reaction) releases substantial carbon. The material is essentially 'dead' matter forced into permanence, and when the building ends, it mostly becomes waste. This logic built the modern world and is not going away, but its carbon and resource cost is enormous.

The biological logic is fundamentally different. A bio-based material is *grown* by a living organism - a tree, a bamboo culm, a hemp or straw crop, a fungus - using sunlight, water, soil and, crucially, carbon dioxide pulled from the air. Photosynthesis builds plant matter largely out of atmospheric carbon, so a growing plant is a carbon *capture* device, and the material it becomes is, in effect, stored atmospheric carbon for as long as it stays in the building (the carbon case, Module 1.1). The energy to 'make' it came free from the sun, not from burning fuel. And because the organism regrows, the material is genuinely renewable - a well-managed forest, bamboo grove or crop field produces more next season. Instead of taking finite matter and adding carbon, bio-based materials take renewable matter and can subtract carbon. That inversion is the heart of their appeal.

This is not new - humanity built with timber, bamboo, thatch, reed and earth for millennia before industrial materials, and much of the world still does, richly so in India. What is new is threefold: the science to engineer grown materials to high performance (mass timber, engineered bamboo, hempcrete), the climate imperative that makes their carbon advantage suddenly central, and the frontier of genuinely *living* materials. The course treats the whole span - from the ancient and proven to the experimental and unproven - and is careful to say which is which.

EXTRACTED-AND-COOKED vs GROWNEXTRACTIVE LOGICbrick, steel, cement, glass1. Quarry / mine FINITE matter2. Apply fierce HEAT (and burn fuel)3. Force dead matter into permanenceCO2carbon ADDED to airnon-renewable sourceenergy from burning fueltake matter + add carbonBIOLOGICAL LOGICtimber, bamboo, hemp, straw, cork1. An organism GROWS the material2. Sunlight + water + CO2 from air3. The source REGROWS - renewableCO2carbon STORED in materialrenewable sourceenergy free from the sunrenew matter + subtract carbon
Zoom
The two logics of where building matter comes from. The EXTRACTIVE logic quarries or mines finite matter and applies fierce heat to cook it into permanence (firing brick, smelting steel, calcining cement), releasing carbon at almost every step - dead matter forced into shape, adding carbon. The BIOLOGICAL logic grows the material with an organism using sunlight, water and carbon dioxide pulled from the air, so the material is, in effect, stored atmospheric carbon and the source regrows - renewable matter that can subtract carbon. Bio-based materials invert the extract-and-cook logic: grow it, do not cook it.

Extractive: dig up + burn = add carbon, dead matter. Biological: grow with sun + CO2 = store carbon, renewable. Grow it, don't cook it.

Bio-based versus living - a distinction to keep

Within the family, one distinction matters enough to fix at the outset, because the words are used loosely and mean quite different things (Module 0.2 goes deeper). Bio-based materials are made *from* biological sources but are no longer alive by the time they are in the building - the tree was felled and sawn, the hemp harvested and mixed with lime, the fungus grown and then dried and killed to make a stable board. They are the *product* of life, renewable and often carbon-storing, but inert in place. This is the large, mostly proven, and immediately usable category: timber, bamboo, cork, hemp, straw, wood-fibre, natural-fibre composites, and many bioplastics. For a designer today, this is where almost all the real, buildable opportunity is.

Living materials are the frontier: materials that are grown and remain, or recently were, *biologically active* - able to grow, self-repair, or respond. This includes mycelium left partly alive to keep binding, bacterial bio-cement where microbes precipitate mineral to cement particles together, self-healing bio-concrete where dormant bacteria wake to seal cracks, and the living plants of a green wall. These are genuinely exciting and genuinely early - mostly laboratory and pilot stage, with real questions about performance, durability, keeping them alive (or safely dormant), scaling and cost. Confusing 'bio-based' with 'living' - or treating a lab-stage living material as a ready building product - is a common and costly error this course guards against.

A simple way to hold it: bio-based = grown from life, then used as a stable product (large, proven, use it now); living = still or again alive, growing/healing/responding (small, frontier, watch and pilot it). Both belong in a course on building with the living world, and both matter, but they sit at very different points of maturity and risk. Much of this course is the proven bio-based family (Modules 2, 3, 4); Modules 5 and 6 take the living frontier seriously but honestly.

BIO-BASED vs LIVING - A DISTINCTION TO KEEPBIO-BASEDgrown from life, then used as astable product (no longer alive)- renewable, often carbon-storing- inert in place- timber, bamboo, cork, hemp,straw, wood-fibrelarge - PROVEN - use it nowModules 2, 3, 4LIVINGstill or again ALIVE - grows,self-heals or responds- mycelium left alive- bacterial bio-cement- self-healing bio-concrete- living wallssmall - FRONTIER - watch itModules 5, 6<- maturity, buildable todaynovelty, hype, lab-stage ->
Zoom
The distinction to keep. BIO-BASED materials are made FROM life but are no longer alive in the building - the tree felled and sawn, the hemp mixed with lime, the fungus grown then dried and killed to a stable board. They are the product of life: renewable, often carbon-storing, but inert in place - the large, mostly proven, immediately usable category (timber, bamboo, cork, hemp, straw, wood-fibre). LIVING materials are the frontier: grown and still (or recently) biologically active - able to grow, self-repair or respond - mycelium left alive, bacterial bio-cement, self-healing bio-concrete, living walls. Genuinely exciting and genuinely early: mostly lab and pilot stage. Bio-based = use it now; living = watch and pilot it.

The honest part: 'natural' is not 'automatically sustainable'

No claim in this field is more seductive or more abused than 'natural', and an honest course has to puncture it immediately: a material being bio-based, natural or grown does not automatically make it sustainable, low-carbon or the right choice. Greenwash thrives on the warm glow of the word 'natural', and a literate designer learns to look past it to the actual facts. Several honest caveats run through the whole course. Sourcing and land use: a bio-based material is only as good as how it was grown - timber from a clear-cut old-growth forest, or a crop that displaced food or drove deforestation, can be worse than a conventional material; only genuinely *sustainably sourced* bio-materials deliver the benefit (Module 8.1). The carbon is not permanent unless the material stays in use: stored carbon returns to the air if the material rots or is burned at end of life, so the carbon benefit depends on durability and reuse (Module 8.4). Performance and durability: bio-based materials can be more vulnerable to fire, moisture, rot and pests, and must be detailed, treated and protected correctly - a badly used natural material that fails early is not sustainable (Module 7). Processing and transport: a 'natural' material shipped across the world or heavily processed and bonded with synthetic resins may lose much of its advantage.

And for living materials specifically, the honesty must be sharper still: most are early, unproven at building scale, not yet code-approved, and surrounded by breathless hype about 'buildings that grow themselves' that runs far ahead of reality. Treating a mycelium panel or bacterial bio-cement as a mature product today is a mistake; treating it as a promising, closely-watched frontier is right.

So this course holds two things together. Building with the living world is genuinely one of the most hopeful shifts available - real carbon storage, real renewability, real health and beauty, and a real frontier of living materials. AND it is wrapped in more greenwash than almost any other field, and 'natural' guarantees nothing. The competent designer is excited by grown and living materials and rigorous about verifying that any given one is actually well-sourced, durable, safe and genuinely low-carbon in its real use - which is exactly the discipline this course builds.

'NATURAL' != AUTOMATICALLY GREENThe warm glow of "natural" guarantees nothing - four checks decide it:1. SOURCING + LAND USEonly sustainably-sourced delivers;clear-cut / deforesting can beworse than conventional2. STAYS IN USEstored carbon returns to air if itrots or is burned - durability andreuse decide the benefit3. DURABILITYvulnerable to fire, moisture, rot,pests - must be detailed andprotected, or it fails early4. PROCESSING + TRANSPORTheavy synthetic-resin bonding orshipping across the world erodesthe advantage - verify, do not trust
Zoom
The honesty at the heart of the course: NATURAL is not the same as AUTOMATICALLY GREEN. Greenwash thrives on the warm glow of the word natural, and a literate designer looks past it to four hard checks. SOURCING and land use: only genuinely sustainably-sourced material delivers the benefit - clear-cut old-growth timber or a crop that drove deforestation can be worse than conventional. STAYS IN USE: the stored carbon returns to air if the material rots or is burned, so durability and reuse decide it. DURABILITY: bio-materials can be vulnerable to fire, moisture, rot and pests and must be detailed and protected, or they fail early. PROCESSING and transport: heavy synthetic-resin bonding or shipping across the world erodes the advantage. Verify - do not trust the glow.

'Natural' != automatically green. Check: sourcing/land use, does the carbon stay stored, durability/fire/rot, processing/transport. Verify, don't trust the warm glow.

What this course teaches - and what it defers

This course builds bio-based and living-materials literacy as a practical, honest design skill. You will start with materials that grow - building with the living world, bio-based vs living, the landscape, the greenwash (Module 0); then why bio-based materials matter - the carbon case, renewability, health/biophilia, the caveats (Module 1); timber and wood-based materials - timber and mass timber, bamboo, cork and wood products, wood in the building (Module 2); plant and agri-based materials - hemp/hempcrete, straw, agricultural waste, natural fibres (Module 3); earth and mineral-bio materials - earth/mud/cob/rammed earth, bio-based insulation, natural finishes, combining bio and conventional (Module 4); living and grown materials - what living materials are, mycelium, bio-cement/bacterial, algae/bioplastics/the frontier (Module 5); living systems on buildings - green walls, green roofs, self-healing bio-materials, bio-integrated design (Module 6); performance, durability and safety - structural, fire/moisture/durability, pests/rot, health/air/life-cycle (Module 7); sourcing, codes and economics - sustainable sourcing/land use, codes and approval, cost and supply, carbon accounting (Module 8); reality, limits and honesty - bio-washing, not-automatically-green, when bio-materials do not fit, the living-materials reality check (Module 9); and practice and the future - the designer's role, getting started, India, becoming bio-materials-literate (Module 10).

One firm boundary runs through all of it. Bio-based and living materials rest on hard structural, fire, moisture, durability and health science, and this course teaches the principles and design judgement, not the binding technical design. It defers every binding result - the structural performance, fire behaviour, moisture/durability/pest strategy, health and life-cycle claims, and carbon figures of any bio-based or living material - to qualified structural, fire and materials engineers, verified test data and Environmental Product Declarations, and the governing codes and standards (the National Building Code of India, relevant IS standards and recognised methods). Any figure, strength, carbon value or durability cited here is illustrative and depends heavily on species, product and context - treat it as a guide to the principle, not a specification.

Studio Matrx is free and not-for-profit, and this course is written to be rigorous and honest - not a celebration of everything 'natural' but a clear, critical grounding in building with grown and living materials, mindful of the Indian context where a magnificent tradition of bamboo, mud, thatch and lime already exists, where enormous agricultural-residue resources are largely wasted, and where codes, durability in a hot-humid monsoon climate, termites, and the unjust perception of natural materials as 'poor' are real challenges. Understand the extracted-versus-grown inversion, the bio-based-versus-living distinction, the genuine carbon and health case, and above all the discipline that 'natural' must be verified not trusted - and you will be able to build with the living world wisely, where it genuinely delivers.

Verify-this: the material strategy is yours; the binding performance is the specialists'

Bio-based vs living

Grown-then-used (proven) versus still-alive (frontier)

Keep the distinction: bio-based is the large, mostly usable category; living materials are mostly early/lab-stage. Do not treat a frontier material as a ready product. Modules 0.2, 5.

'Natural' is not 'sustainable'

Whether a bio-material actually delivers its benefit

Depends on sourcing/land use, staying in use, durability and processing/transport - verified, not assumed from the word 'natural'. Modules 8.1, 8.4, 9.2.

Structural, fire, moisture & durability

Whether a bio/living material is safe and lasts

Binding structural, fire, moisture, rot/pest and durability performance belongs to qualified engineers, verified test data and the codes (NBC India, IS). Module 7.

Carbon & EPDs

The real carbon value of a bio-material

Carbon storage is real but conditional; use verified data / EPDs and proper whole-life accounting, not a blanket 'it stores carbon' claim. Cross-link Embodied Carbon. Module 8.4.

Hands-on workshop

Workshop — trace where a building's materials came from, and spot the grown ones

Bio-materials thinking starts with seeing the difference between extracted and grown matter, and asking honestly whether 'natural' would actually be better. In this first workshop you will audit a building you know for its material origins and reason about substituting grown for extracted.

Just a building you know and a notebook. No calculation - this is about seeing extracted vs grown and verifying 'natural' honestly; the materials, performance and carbon detail come later, with engineers and verified data.

Given & goal
Goal: a first, qualitative read of material origins and the honest bio-material case
Inputs: a building you know + this lesson + a notebook
Time: ~40 minutes
  1. 1Sort the materials by origin: list the main materials and mark each as EXTRACTED-and-cooked (brick, steel, cement, glass) or GROWN/bio-based (timber, bamboo, any natural finish) - notice the balance.
  2. 2Find the biggest extractive carbon: which one or two materials likely carry the most embodied carbon (usually the structure - concrete/steel)? These are where a grown substitute would matter most.
  3. 3Propose a grown substitute: for one, name a plausible bio-based alternative (mass timber or bamboo structure, hempcrete or straw wall, bio-based insulation, natural finish) - as a hypothesis.
  4. 4Stress-test 'natural': for that substitute, ask the honest questions - is it sustainably sourceable locally? will it stay in use to keep its carbon? can it be detailed to survive this climate's fire/moisture/rot/termites? Would it genuinely be better?
  5. 5Write a one-paragraph reflection: where grown materials could genuinely cut this building's carbon, where 'natural' would be a false comfort, and what you would need an engineer or verified data to confirm - flagged as reasoning.

You’ll walk away with
A one-page read: the building's extracted-vs-grown material split, its biggest extractive carbon, one bio-based substitute stress-tested against the honest caveats, and what needs verifying - framed as reasoning. Keep it; you will put real method behind it across the course.

The worked example

Three altitudes on the same idea

Read the band that fits you — or all three.

For the architectBuilding with grown, low-carbon materials - honestly and where they fit

Bio-based materials are one of the most powerful levers you have on a building's carbon, and choosing them well is a core design skill - but 'natural' must be verified, not trusted. Grown materials (timber, bamboo, hemp, straw, cork, wood-fibre) can store carbon and are renewable, and they reward being designed in from the start - structure, envelope, insulation and finish. But the benefit is real only if the material is genuinely sustainably sourced, kept in use long enough to keep its carbon stored, and detailed to survive fire, moisture, rot and pests (critical in a hot-humid, termite-prone climate). Learn the palette, the carbon and health case, and how to protect and detail bio-materials; treat living materials as a promising frontier to watch, not a ready product. Defer structural, fire, moisture, durability and carbon verification to qualified engineers, verified test data/EPDs and the codes (NBC India, IS); own the material strategy and the honest sourcing and durability judgement.

For the interior designerBio-based finishes, natural materials and healthy, biophilic interiors

Interiors are where bio-based materials are most immediately usable and most rewarding - and where healthy, biophilic, low-carbon material choices land closest to people. Natural finishes, cork, wood-fibre, bamboo, natural-fibre textiles and clay/lime plasters and paints bring warmth, beauty, better indoor air (many avoid the synthetic VOCs of conventional finishes) and a biophilic connection to the living world that measurably supports wellbeing. Learn the interior bio-materials palette, how to judge genuine low-VOC natural finishes from greenwashed ones, and how to detail natural materials for durability in real use. Coordinate binding fire, structural and health-performance matters with the specialists and verified data; your domain is the healthy, warm, low-carbon, biophilic interior built from materials that were grown rather than cooked.

For the studentHow materials grow, store carbon, and (sometimes) live - and their real limits

Building with grown and living materials is one of the most hopeful and fast-moving frontiers in architecture - and understanding it clearly, hope balanced by honesty, sets you apart. Start with this lesson's inversion: conventional materials are dug up and cooked (adding carbon), while bio-based materials are grown with sun and CO2 (storing carbon, renewable), and living materials are the alive-or-recently-alive frontier. Build the real understanding: the carbon and health case, the proven bio-based palette (timber, bamboo, hemp, straw, earth), the living-materials frontier (mycelium, bio-cement), and above all the discipline that 'natural' is not automatically sustainable - sourcing, durability, fire and honesty all matter. You are not expected to certify a material; you are expected to be bio-materials-literate and to verify claims rather than trust the warm glow. This is a climate-critical, imaginative field and a strong, values-driven portfolio thread.

Misconception check

Bio-based and natural materials are automatically the sustainable, low-carbon, healthy choice - if a material is natural, grown or 'bio', it is inherently green and better for the planet than a conventional one. And living materials mean we can already grow buildings that repair themselves.

Both halves are dangerously over-simplified. 'Natural' or 'bio-based' is NOT automatically sustainable, and the warm glow of the word hides a great deal of greenwash. A bio-based material delivers its promise only under real conditions: it must be genuinely sustainably sourced (timber from a clear-cut old-growth forest, or a crop that drove deforestation or displaced food, can be worse than a conventional material); its stored carbon only stays out of the atmosphere if the material stays in use and is not rotted or burned at end of life; it must be durable, and detailed and protected against fire, moisture, rot and pests, or it fails early and its 'sustainability' evaporates; and if it is heavily processed, bonded with synthetic resins, or shipped across the world, much of the advantage is lost. A well-sourced, durable, locally-grown bio-material can be wonderfully low-carbon and healthy; a badly-sourced, poorly-detailed or over-processed one may not be. Equally, living materials - mycelium, bacterial bio-cement, self-healing bio-concrete - are a genuinely exciting FRONTIER, but they are mostly early, laboratory and pilot stage, largely not code-approved, and nowhere near 'buildings that grow and repair themselves' at scale; treating them as mature products today is a serious error. The competent stance is neither natural-material romanticism nor cynical dismissal, but rigorous verification: be excited by grown and living materials, and check that any specific one is actually well-sourced, durable, safe and genuinely low-carbon in its real use - with the binding structural, fire, durability and carbon facts confirmed by engineers, verified data and the codes, never assumed from the word 'natural'.
Try it

Do it yourself

No tools needed — reason it through.

  1. 1Contrast the extractive logic (dig up + cook, add carbon) with the biological logic (grow with sun + CO2, store carbon) of making materials.
  2. 2Explain how a growing plant makes a bio-based material a form of stored atmospheric carbon.
  3. 3Distinguish bio-based materials from living materials, and give examples and the maturity of each.
  4. 4Why is 'natural' not the same as 'automatically sustainable'? Name the honest caveats (sourcing, staying in use, durability, processing).
  5. 5Why should living materials be treated as a frontier to watch rather than ready products today?
Take this with you

The one line to carry out

Bio-based materials are grown from renewable biological sources with sunlight and carbon pulled from the air - so they can store carbon and renew, inverting the extract-and-cook logic of conventional materials - and living materials are the alive-or-recently-alive frontier; but 'natural' is not automatically sustainable (sourcing, staying in use, durability and processing all decide it), living materials are mostly early and hyped, and every binding structural, fire, durability and carbon fact must be verified by engineers, data and the codes rather than trusted from the warm glow of the word.
Take it further
References & further reading

Peer-reviewed journals & authoritative standards

  1. 01Bio-based materialWikipedia — Bio-based material, 2026.
  2. 02Building materialWikipedia — Building material, 2026.
  3. 03Mycelium / living materialsWikipedia — Mycelium, 2026.
Related lessons
Recap
Conventional building materials follow an extractive logic - quarry or mine finite matter and cook it with fierce heat (firing brick, smelting steel, calcining cement), releasing large amounts of carbon to force dead matter into permanence. Bio-based materials invert this: they are grown by living organisms using sunlight, water and carbon dioxide pulled from the air, so many of them store atmospheric carbon and are genuinely renewable - timber, bamboo, hemp, straw, cork, wood-fibre, and newer arrivals like mycelium and bioplastics. At the far frontier, living materials are grown and remain (or recently were) alive - mycelium composites, bacterial bio-cement, self-healing bio-concrete, living walls - genuinely exciting but mostly early, lab/pilot stage and not yet code-approved. The crucial distinction: bio-based = grown then used as a stable product (large, proven, usable now); living = still or again alive (small, frontier, watch and pilot). And the crucial discipline: 'natural' is NOT automatically sustainable - the benefit depends on genuinely sustainable sourcing and land use, the material staying in use so its carbon stays stored, durability and correct detailing against fire/moisture/rot/pests, and low processing/transport - all verified, not trusted. Building with the living world is one of the most hopeful shifts in materials, and among the most greenwashed, so the competent designer verifies rather than romanticises, with all binding structural, fire, durability and carbon facts deferred to engineers, verified data/EPDs and the codes.
Carry forward →

To build with grown materials well we need the case made properly - exactly how bio-materials store carbon, what renewability and the biological cycle really mean, the genuine health and biophilic benefits, and the honest caveats. Next we build that case.

A

The author

Amogh N P

Architect, interior designer, and creative polymath. Studio Matrx began in his notebooks — his vision of design made honest, useful, and open to everyone. Its Academy is written and taught in his memory, and free, forever.

More about Amogh →